Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems : A Case Law Study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU
The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanct...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Livre numérique |
| Jazyk: | Anglais |
| Vydáno: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing
[20..].
Cham : Springer Nature |
| Edice: | Legal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law
8 |
| On-line přístup: | Accès sur la plateforme Springer Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX Accès Université d'Orléans |
| Poznámka: |
Springer e-books droit et criminologie (Licence nationale) |
| Autres localisations: | Voir dans le Sudoc |
| Edition sous un autre format: | • Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems, a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU, Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas, 2023, Cham (Switzerland), Springer, 1 volume (VIII, 222 pages), Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law, 978-3-031-16555-9 • Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems, Texte imprimé, 9783031165573 • Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems, Texte imprimé, 9783031165580 |
| LEADER | 04403nam a22003137a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1211761 | ||
| 008 | 230203t20XX2023xx ||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 009 | PPN267809921 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783031165566 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | |a 340.9 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems : |b A Case Law Study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU |c by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas. |
| 260 | |a Cham : |b Springer International Publishing. | ||
| 260 | |a Cham : |b Springer Nature, |c [20..]. | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Legal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law |v 8 |x 2524-8057 | |
| 500 | |a Springer e-books droit et criminologie (Licence nationale) | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks. | |
| 506 | |a Accès en ligne pour les établissements français bénéficiaires des licences nationales | ||
| 506 | |a Accès soumis à abonnement pour tout autre établissement | ||
| 506 | |a Conditions particulières de réutilisation pour les bénéficiaires des licences nationales. https://www.licencesnationales.fr/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2023-10_Collex_Springer_CCTP.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian Supreme Court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The second part of the book critically analyses three problems with the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Part three deals with reconceptualizing the prohibition of multiple punishment and the prohibition of multiple prosecutions. Finally, the fourth part addresses other possible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time. | ||
| 776 | 0 | |0 27266023X |t Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems |o a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU |f Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas |d 2023 |c Cham (Switzerland) |n Springer |p 1 volume (VIII, 222 pages) |s Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law |z 978-3-031-16555-9 | |
| 776 | 0 | |t Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems |b Texte imprimé |z 9783031165573 | |
| 776 | 0 | |t Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems |b Texte imprimé |z 9783031165580 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6 |z Accès sur la plateforme Springer | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://revue-sommaire.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/8Q1-RMC79HCR-G |z Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX | |
| 856 | 4 | |5 452349901:822328275 |u https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6 |z Accès Université d'Orléans | |
| 997 | |0 1211761 |1 Livre numérique |a Ressource numérique |b INSA |b ENSA |c 0/Bibliothèque numérique/ |c 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Autre ressource numérique/ | ||