Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents : A Computational Argumentation Approach
This book introduces methods to analyze legal documents such as negotiation records and legal precedents, using computational argumentation theory. First, a method to automatically evaluate argumentation skills from the records of argumentation exercises is proposed. In law school, argumentation exe...
Guardat en:
| Autors principals: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Livre numérique |
| Idioma: | Anglais |
| Publicat: |
Singapore :
Springer Nature Singapore
[20..].
Cham : Springer Nature |
| Col·lecció: | Translational Systems Sciences
29 |
| Accés en línia: | Accès sur la plateforme Springer Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX Accès Université d'Orléans |
| Nota: |
Springer e-books droit et criminologie (Licence nationale) |
| Autres localisations: | Voir dans le Sudoc |
| Edition sous un autre format: | • Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents, Texte imprimé, 9789811929274 • Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents, Texte imprimé, 9789811929298 • Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents, Texte imprimé, 9789811929304 |
| LEADER | 04131nam a22003257a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1211612 | ||
| 008 | 220905t20XX2022xx ||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 009 | PPN264193059 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789811929281 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | |a 344.01 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hirata, Hayato. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents : |b A Computational Argumentation Approach |c by Hayato Hirata ; Katsumi Nitta. |
| 260 | |a Singapore : |b Springer Nature Singapore. | ||
| 260 | |a Cham : |b Springer Nature, |c [20..]. | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Translational Systems Sciences |v 29 |x 2197-8840 | |
| 500 | |a Springer e-books droit et criminologie (Licence nationale) | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Related Research -- Chapter 3 -- Factor-Based Argumentation Evaluation -- Chapter 4. Case Analysis Using Factors and Legal Topoi -- Chapter 5. Case Analysis for Case Law Education using Factors and Computational Argumentation Theory -- Chapter 6. Conclusion. | |
| 506 | |a Accès en ligne pour les établissements français bénéficiaires des licences nationales | ||
| 506 | |a Accès soumis à abonnement pour tout autre établissement | ||
| 506 | |a Conditions particulières de réutilisation pour les bénéficiaires des licences nationales. https://www.licencesnationales.fr/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2023-10_Collex_Springer_CCTP.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a This book introduces methods to analyze legal documents such as negotiation records and legal precedents, using computational argumentation theory. First, a method to automatically evaluate argumentation skills from the records of argumentation exercises is proposed. In law school, argumentation exercises are often conducted and many records of them are produced. From each utterance in the record, a pattern of speech act +factor is extracted, and argumentation skills are evaluated from the sequences of the patterns, using a scoring prediction model constructed by multiple regression analyses between the appearance pattern and the scoring results. The usefulness of this method is shown by applying it to the example case the garbage house problem . Second, a method of extracting factors (elements that characterize precedents and cases) and legal topoi from individual precedents and using them as the expression of precedents to analyze how the pattern of factors and legal topoi appearing in a group of precedents affects the judgment (plaintiff wins/defendant wins) is proposed. This method has been applied to a group of tax cases. Third, the logical structure of 70 labor cases is described in detail by using factors and a bipolar argumentation framework (BAF) and an (extended argumentation framework (EAF) together. BAF describes the logical structure between plaintiff and defendant, and EAF describes the decision of the judge. Incorporating the legal topoi into the EAF of computational argumentation theory, the strength of the analysis of precedents by combined use of factored BAF and EAF, not only which argument the judge adopted could be specified. It was also possible to determine what kind of value judgment was made and to verify the logic. The analysis methods in this book demonstrate the application of logic-based AI methods to the legal domain, and they contribute to the education and training of law school students in logical ways of argumentation. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Nitta, Katsumi. |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | |t Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents |b Texte imprimé |z 9789811929274 | |
| 776 | 0 | |t Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents |b Texte imprimé |z 9789811929298 | |
| 776 | 0 | |t Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents |b Texte imprimé |z 9789811929304 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1 |z Accès sur la plateforme Springer | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://revue-sommaire.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/8Q1-GBZD73KQ-C |z Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX | |
| 856 | 4 | |5 452349901:822328933 |u https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1 |z Accès Université d'Orléans | |
| 997 | |0 1211612 |1 Livre numérique |a Ressource numérique |b INSA |b ENSA |c 0/Bibliothèque numérique/ |c 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Autre ressource numérique/ | ||